"When Dabholkar comes to Delhi next, I must get the
two of you together," Dr J P Naik, would say. When I was to go to
Bombay for some work, he would urge, "Take two days off, go to
Kolhapur and meet Dabholkar." Years passed, Dr J P Naik passed away,
I never got to meet his friend, Dr Shripad Dabholkar. And then I saw
a little snippet in a video magazine of the Plus Channel. It
was about an agronomist in Bombay, Dr R T Doshi. The programme
showed his roof farm -- on his roof in the middle of Bombay, he was
cultivating grapes, vegetables, fruit, even six foot high sugarcane.
I went to visit him the next time I got to Bombay. The second time I
was able to take Anita, my wife along. I am just following the
methods of Dr Dabholkar, Dr Doshi told us. Therefore, when the
Pudhari group of newspapers asked me to deliver a memorial
lecture in Kolhapur, I agreed at once to do so.
And even before the lecture, I went to Dr
Dabholkar's house. It was late in the evening. A score or more
villagers were there. It turned out that villagers from all over
Maharashtra visit the place regularly -- to see, to learn, to share
their knowledge and the results of their experiments. I still
remember my gasp of wonderment as we came out of the staircase and
stepped on to the roof of Dr Dabholkar's modest house. Vegetables in
pots. On one side, corn stalks five feet high. In another,
sugarcane. In one pot -- just a small 12" pot -- a mango plant with
a mango larger than my hand. A layer of soil made from
vegetable-waste, from leaves and the rest : Dr Dabholkar would lean
down, and pluck from under the surface ginger, garlic, even
potatoes. On one side, by the wall, standing high and erect in what
seemed just a pile of the same sort of soil, a subabul tree
-- almost two storeys high.
I was wonder-struck, and returned to Delhi full of
enthusiasm. Anita and her mother had started a roof garden. They
were enthused to do more, they began to experiment with some of the
new ways Dr Dabholkar had worked out. Today the garden is a joy for
all of us. It has flowering plants of various kinds. A 6'
bottle-brush tree, a 5' ficus, vines of several sorts. Bougainvillea
of many colours blaze away, the ones which are planted on the ground
below have climbed two storeys, the ones on this roof climb another
storey. Harsinghar, Oleander, Champa, Anar, two varieties of
Gulmohar -- with the evocative names Krishnachur and
Radhachur -- each 5' tall in pots, lemon grass, basil,
karonda, the tulsi of course, fragrant motia
and juhi, bamboo gifted by a friend in Assam.... Each plant
is a joy for Anita and her mother, each is a boon for me -- for the
room in which I work opens on to this lovely garden, and beyond it
are trees, almost thirty of these have been planted in and around
our house by Anita. Each time I step into the garden, I am of course
grateful for their labour of love, I am also reminded of that
magical evening at Dr Dabholkar's house.
All these years I have felt, "If only there were a
book that set out what Dr Dabholkar has done, his experiments, the
methods which he has evolved..." At last Dr Dabholkar has himself
completed a book about his life and experiments. Entitled, Plenty
for All it is being published by the Mehta Publishing House of
Kolhapur.
Dr Dabholkar's life is a romance. It is also a life
of enormous achievement. Ever since he was a child, Dabholkar had a
fascination for experiments, and he had a real gift in growing
vegetables, fruit, plants : pumpkins in pots -- the vine would
originate in the pot, the pumpkin would sprout in and then come to
rest outside it, its size larger than the pot! -- watermelons in
riverbeds, bananas in stone heaps.
Dabholkar graduated, but instead of taking a
conventional job, he began "Open self-study courses". With no more
capital than a chalk and a blackboard, he began giving instruction
to anyone and everyone who came forward -- mostly persons who had
dropped out from conventional schools, those who had failed in
conventional classes, elderly women. He would teach them whatever
they wanted to learn. His teaching would prepare them for securing
admissions to and degrees from the institutionalized system.
But the methods of imparting knowledge were
entirely non-conventional : "I never had to impart teaching,
coaching or tuition to anyone," he writes. "It was not a class in
the regular sense. My methods were (1) to make one understand the
form of the subject under study, its conceptual contents, the
catchwords and the terminology used...; (2) the relationship of
ideas and topics; (3) some common analogies and illustrations from
their own life situations; (4) all this in the students' own form of
expression...; (5) in about 15 to 20 sessions, I treated the
subject; (6) for the rest of the year I allowed the student to work
out the rest of the subject himself, with the aid of my card-sets;
(7) he also interacted with textbooks, and (8) with anyone in the
group who he thought could help discuss and resolve his difficulty."
The institution became a great success -- Dabholkar
himself was earning more than principals of conventional
institutions in the town, students from advanced educational
institutions located far away were coming to attend the courses for
at least a few days. A second branch of the institution was soon set
up 50 kilometers away. The work went on for 8 years, Dabholkar began
losing interest in it. He wound up the place entirely. "I began to
pine for a complete break with the entire system," he explains, "I
am not the type suited to permanent institutional forms of any
type." He heard of and soon joined the Mouni Vidyapeeth, an
institution which Dr J P Naik had helped found. It was 55 kilometers
from the nearest urban settlement. Here he was given the fullest
opportunity to put his ideas of non-institutional learning into
practice. "I made an open call to various staff members to undertake
to teach any subject that they liked the most, irrespective of their
academic qualifications, to whosoever wanted to learn it. No fees
were charged and no regular remuneration was given," he records.
"The entire manner of covering syllabi rested with the learner and
the guide-friend. It worked smoothly and successfully. Without any
type of institutional form or pressure, more than a hundred students
received their secondary certificates as well as their much coveted
university degrees by studying at any odd free time that they and
their guide-friends found suitable."
In spite of the success of this experiment too,
Dabholkar soon concluded that the complex life of our rural areas
could just not be changed through institutional activities and
training : "In whatever way the institutions may work, the standard
curriculum of the system kills all the germs of creativity and
originality," he writes -- a lesson that is recited at every seminar
on education, but a lesson to which our educational institutions
have shut their ears.
By 1966, Dabholkar had begun work in an entirely
new sphere, work which was to transform the lives of lakhs and
lakhs. At Mouni Vidyapeeth, each staff member had a modest house
with a little space around it. With his childhood fascination for
experiments, and his gift at growing plants, Dabholkar began
experiments in agriculture, horticulture, poultry, sericulture, in
rearing goats, in rearing rabbits, in developing arid wasteland....
In everything he did, he would start with no more resources than are
available to a farmer living below the poverty line -- a farmer who
is in debt, who has no land other than a patch of dry wasteland, who
has no resource other than his own unpaid labour.
"The whole place, which used to be barren
wasteland," he writes, "became like a forest of fruit plants, all
healthy, all productive and all taking their nourishment from the
symbiotic built-in aggregate from the garden waste." People started
visiting the place -- to see, to discuss. In ten years about 10,000
visitors had come, left their addresses in the hope that, if he
started courses on the basis of these experiments, he would let them
know. He had thus acquired, without building it, a list of ten
thousand persons -- each one of them eager to participate in the
next phase of his work.
The food situation in the country deteriorated in
the early '60s. In 1965 Pakistan drove into Kutch, and there was
another war. Dabholkar was filled with concern about food
availability in the country. At the invitation of the editor of a
Marathi magazine, Kirloskar, he prepared a special 24-page
supplement in which he gave what he calls a "flash report" of his
experiments and their results. The effect can be glimpsed from the
reaction : the supplement was published in January 1966; within the
year he received over 10,000 letters from persons offering to join
his network of experimenters.
At the time, few thought that grapes could be grown
in drought-prone areas of Maharashtra. Dabholkar began with this
precise fruit. Today the drought prone areas of Maharashtra -- with
annual rainfall of no more than 12" -- produce grapes worth Rs
five hundred crores a year. Farmers in his net produce
sixteen tons of grapes to an acre. They have been given
national awards for their innovative practices, for the yields they
have secured.
It is not just in the amounts produced that
Dabholkar has made a breakthrough. He and his "Prayog
Parivar" -- his family of experimenters -- has revolutionized
every aspect of grape cultivation -- spacing the vines, training
them, thinning and girdling them, preserving the fruit, and so on.
And grapes are just one of the crops which have
felt his touch. And in the case of every crop his experiments and
innovations have been attuned to the small and marginal farmer. And
to using locally available resources -- not just resources available
in the locality, but resources available on that small plot of a
quarter acre or an acre : obtaining in this round one set of
nutrients from plants of one type for the next round, obtaining
different nutrients from different parts -- the roots, the leaves,
the stems, husk, bagasse -- of the plant, obtaining different
nutrients by composting the plant at different stages of its growth.
He has established that a family of five with just a quarter of an
acre can grow enough to acquire a living standard in terms of
nourishment and income of a middle class family -- and this has been
established not in theory but in the plots themselves, and not just
by him but by farmers and families which have adopted the methods he
has pioneered.
No wonder, he is today, and has been for fifteen
years in demand all over Maharashtra. He travels incessantly --
holding "classes" all over, these are attended by 400 to 1200
farmers. His house, as I saw, is a living school.
Dabholkar's life and work hold a score of lessons.
To start with, consider the effect he has had -- the output of
grapes is today Rs five hundred crores, this is so in the
areas of Maharashtra which are drought-prone, it is the output which
farmers with holdings of half an acre to two acres a piece have
secured. How many lakhs of lives must have been transformed as a
result of this venture alone. As I put this effect alongside the
"effect" which our "Demand-and-Denounce" activists have, I am
reminded of what Gandhiji said while chiding the young Communists.
They would prance around as Revolutionaries -- with a capital 'R',
and heap abuse at him, "an agent of the bourgeoisie," they would
shout, a "lackey of imperialism," they would shriek, "an instrument
of the bania-landlord class," they would howl, "a
representative of the comprador classes," they would scream, "the
blind messiah," they would yell. Gandhiji smiled, and remarked,
"Many have just talked revolution, I have worked one !"
In contrast to our activists -- and what a mass
base they have managed to contrive in press clubs! -- Dabholkar too
is one who has in fact wrought a revolution. But that, as we shall
see, is just the first of many things which set Dabholkar
apart.